jock

and a special one for "killer" :nono:

Good meet today, small, but good food, and good to meet some new people. Final line up included tack, shahid, killer, myself, geof, richard, a few laydeez and a potential new member pics below. Re the parking, there always seems to be some little hot hatch gets in the mix.lol

Someone has changed that then bud, as I have done a few of these on uks and jap and they all had a proper bolt and nut. On mine, because I had an aftermarket pipe, I could get to it from underneath, I think if you still have the crossover box in the middle of the pipe it knackers you though.

Even less to stop you b1n'ng it then :)

The FPR on the NA is the same as on the turbo (ive been told), but why do you want 370 injectors on an NA? Mine was running 225 rwhp on the standard injectors and was not maxing them out

SE do sell them, they are made from a fiat unit IIRC, when I asked about them was quoted around the 450 mark.

is it this? i had one on my jap spec NA, same thing a plug with nothing attached, tho had a power and an earth, asked the same question but no-one new what it was so took it out and threw it away, didnt seem to do any harm :D

I have the same problem mate, in my case I think its the accent, not so sure about you tho :D

if I am there I will bring my conzult

A group hug? with your reputation? what are you thinking? :D

Well in light of your magnamosity I will chose the last word carefully, let it be sorry. I am truly sorry if you felt that anything I said was a direct criticism of you, it wasnt. instead a comment on the way certain things were done. If it came across as personal I can only think it was because you, at times, appeared to be the voice of the commitee I am similiarly sorry if you felt that I had got personal or snidey, it wasnt intended in that vein. There are no personal issues here Mark, I have met you in person and am sure we will meet again, had I personal issue with you I would have addressed it personally. I cannot, however, apologise for bieng passionate. If I believe something is wrong it is not in my personality to "leave it". Regards Hugh

I recently saw shahid's car, which had the same spoiler arrangement that you have just taken off. Have to say i really liked the look.

Okay, I admit that I thought it was a zed, but in my defence, nowhere on the post did I say it was. Ahem :o.

:rofl: :rofl: :D

Will take that on the chin :slap:

£9 a gallon?? its like blair and co have opened their own petrol station

I am always at peace with everyone Mac, the thing that makes me laugh is that evryone gets het up on a personal basis about all this. I suppose its the downfall of a text conversation

Saw this on the ring road today, looking at the damage on the door and hood, not very well

So if you are gonna make money anyway from a zed anyway, but you use the forum as media for doing this, it makes it ok! I have already stated in this thread, and others that I was grateful that the forum was here as a vehicle for me selling my zed and other benefits, I also stated that I hoped I had gone some way in contributing to it. Are you in turn saying that as i have used the forum thus that I then have no right to ask questions?? You still haven't answered who was accused of giving you information? No I havent, as the information came to me through the grapevine and as I can only substantiate it by dragging others into my arguments I am not willing to do that. See the commenbt re information given to me in a private forum No jock this meant exactly what it said, it had no reference to you whatsoever! No, there was no direct reference to me in that paragraph, but I was under the impression that the sub heading pointed it in my direction Just a couple of points though Jock, since I have to say you have been forward in your viewpoints! There is no secret agenda by the committee, the comittee at this point in time is legally responsible for the forum and will have to answer personnaly for any legal action taken against it! The committee cannot have accusations about traders/members/committee bandied about in a carefree manner, it also cannot support people who carry out dangerous repairs to cars! There is no desire for information to be withheld, but for slander and liable to be contained. I never at any point disagreed with things that were done, only in the way that they were done. You said to me on the phone that the commitee had made a decision based on information that the members did not and should not have access to. I put it to you then, and again elsewhere, that there is no information that the comittee should have access to that the members shouldn't. I didnt suggest for a second anywhere on this forum that people be allowed to slander anyone, but I did say that I believed that to pre judge a sub judis case by acting against onre of the participants was to import risk to the forum, both morally and legally. I asked for a statement of the fact s to be made and it was made. case closed as far as I was concerned. I did not at any time say that the commitee had a secret agenda, in fact the same accusation has been directed at me ( again through the grapevine) "the fact that I only put in for the posts in the election to cause trouble", well if by causing trouble it was meant that I wanted to force an election, in this case your grapevine is bang on, I have a stated belief that if people are to hold positions in any organisation then they should be both elected and accountable. But I will say again, if I had been elected I would have given the post 110%, I dont do anything to be mischievous.

That'll be me going on about this "shareholder crap" then. Or maybe not as I certainly dont rank as having made "a few quid out of this place" How did your breaking of your zed go? If you read back mate, the subject of me breaking my zed has already been covered, but it was my zed and I would have made money out of it wherever, so i dont think it counts as making money out of the forum and, as posted, I like to think that the members who bought also shared the "bounty" in the form of cheaper than usual parts Well the post that all the "shareholder" stuff comes from, got me flack from all angles, people got accused of feeding me information, having private agendas, stirring up trouble, all sorts of shennanigans. Who were the people who got accused and were did the info come from? There was no information, I have spoken to several of the commitee menbers in a private arena (including your goodself) and at no point have I divulged any information, or used any information given to me. This meant that a lot of members saw me as being vocal, so I have heard through the grapevine, but I was just trying to answer their questions. If you are implying mark that you heard something through the grapevine that I didnt say to you in person the night you phoned me, then youre grapevine is mistaken. When asked by you on the phone what I thought of the situation on the forum, I told you that I did not think the commitee had the right to keep information from the members and that doing so displayed a superior attitude which I strongly disagreed with

Thanks bud :)

I havent put my name forward, though it has been mentioned to me by a few people. If, as seems to be the case, Mark has made his decision to go, and there is a vote, I may well do and let the votes decide. That is of course no comment on mark, or the job he has done.

OOH, saucer of cream for beckenham high st??? you two havent fallen out again?? its true what they say about true love then?

Well the post that all the "shareholder" stuff comes from, got me flack from all angles, people got accused of feeding me information, having private agendas, stirring up trouble, all sorts of shennanigans. And that was just one post. I dont let that sort of thing phase me, cos as said, I say what I mean to the person I want to say it to. But if another member read that, are they going to speak up about their concerns?