Coolq

same with a 300zx :clap:

i did say this on the bash post, but most laughed it off.. its stupid not having them how else will we know who a complete stranger is :pinch: next time lets just wear them for god sake.

make me a reasonable offer, they were 650 from new. i still have the paperwork.. http://www.bc-racing.co.uk/c-bcd20/nissan-300zx-z32-90-96/ got mine from the above.

ive got some 6 month old BC racing coilovers for sale .....

ill trade my Z for an E46 M3 or an evo 5/6 + cash your way if anyone is interested....

300zx are so shit arnet they not only do they break down all the time, they ent that fast and we all want different cars LOL

evo all the way. lovely cars. and great to drive .

lightweight flywheel perhaps??? that would explain it.

well from 0-60 yours is faster so that means for all of 5 seconds..... but mikey passed you effortlessly, means his is clearly the fastest, but his starts are poo. so its like this. MIKEYS FASTEST (MOST MODS) GREY Z SECOND ( funnily enough more modded than roses) DEAD WASP last ( least mods) pretty clean and cut to me....

was that you..:tt2: i was gonna race until i saw M3 on the back, then i knew i was in trouble.:hang:

was that the m3 that hollowpoint beat in his 300zx in reverse. lol oh and that veyron dont mean bugger all, its high hp but the torque is nothing compared to the titanic, now that thing was insanely fast not due to its hp but its immense torque. LMAO just kidding Alex.

now that is funny. a 300zx that isnt even running a bar of boost on standard turbos and 370cc injectors is FAST LMAO i like you mate, but that is puree jokes. god knows what your gonna think once you put the boost up to a bar.

theyre wayyyyyyyyy different mate, the Z interior is lovely wraps around the driver and passenger soooo nice. the skyline, yuck!

but quick responding V8 and 350kg weight advantage...... no way would your Z32 have a chance.

yep ugly interior.

Speed Six 4.0L modelEngine type: straight-6 DOHC 24v Power: 350 hp (261 kW; 355 PS) 0-60 mph: 4.4 seconds Top speed: 180 mph (290 km/h) Torque: 330 lb·ft (447 N·m) 4.2L modelEngine type: V8 OHC 16v Power: 360 hp (268 kW; 365 PS) Torque: 320 lb·ft (434 N·m) at 4500 rpm Redline: 7000 rpm 0-60 mph: 4.2 seconds 1/4 mile time 12.4 seconds Top speed: 185 mph (297 km/h) 4.5L modelEngine type: 4475cc V8 OHC 16v Power: 420 hp (313 kW; 426 PS) at 6750 rpm Torque: 380 lb·ft (515 N·m) at 4500 rpm Redline: 7000 rpm 0-60 mph: 3.9 seconds Top speed: 195 mph (313,7 km/h depends which one you took on... but doubt it tried too hard. as its 350kg + lighter than your car, more powerful and much better powerband than wheelspinning Z ( new name for ya car ) wishful thinking tho Alex :-)

get a TVR cerebra. job done.

hope your right. fark wheelspinning everywhere.

oh right, thought he told me otherwise, cheers. love the GTR, wanted on before the 300ZX but was put off by the ugly interior. but power wise. LOVE THEM. im too into drift to have 4wd, yes they are immese and grip like fark, but less fun. and more about fundimentals.

i think it may be your wheels mate. as i rember when changing my alloys for some of my other sets, the car gets nearly undriveable as they're lightweight and spin very easily. stock wheels. were a joke. put 17s on and in 2nd and 3rd they would spin up once boost kicked in as you say put 18s on and they were better put heavy rays on, No wheelspin. all with good tyres, you'd be suprised at the weight difference and as we all know unspring mass is very important.

his is single turbo, i get what your saying, but have you been in a 500 hp Z32 ????

pod is 1/4 mile mate. so standing start :wacko:

hollowpoint, we said rolling start, and i never said id win. ive had races with mustangs supras and a (cadallac ctsv 550hp 550lb/ft standard) and suprised myself, but then the weight was in my favour... dont know the skyline weight, but done a few 400hp liners quite easily before. but never had a play with a 500hp + skyline, so i do entertain the challenge. as for your spinning, god knows, you do say it quite alot, may be down to suspension/ tyre and wheel combination. most folk with your power stage are ok for traction.... ive even seen bobgenie launch his 660 rwhp monster without spinning 1st/2nd gears so its not the power/ torque thats your problem

have to be a rolling start as 4wd would be too kick ass if stationary, but from 40 onwards... something id like to see, as i know 4wd suffer from drive train loss quite heavily. im sure he'd win with more power and longer power band, but again, by how much??? :-)

lol yep, but by how much?????? 650hp skyline against 500hp Z ???