January 29, 200619 yr Hi all - well its my first post.. dont have a Z yet been looking again today! Have MK2 MR2 N/A at the mo, and finally decided after loads of yes and no(ing) with myself that i needed a Z in my life! Id rather a Turbo but insurnce is a tad pricey - although not out of price range. Question is i suppose, is the N/A Z, gonna be a lot quicker than my MR2 (175bhp N/a) anyone know? Anyone had any experience with both of these cars? What is the standard BHP on a Z N/A? Sorry, not that much knowledge about Z's apart that i want one! Thanks in advance.. Ed
January 29, 200619 yr You will probably find a UK TT cheaper to insure than a Import NA (All NA's are imports) NA - 220bhp , 0-60 (6.5 - 7.0secs avg) , 145mph . 1/4 mile in low to mid 15 secs No idea how that compares to the Mr2. For reference TT - 280hp - 0-60 5.5 secs , 175mph, 1/4 mile in 14.0 secs(13.8 - 14.2 avg)
Hi all - well its my first post..
dont have a Z yet been looking again today!
Have MK2 MR2 N/A at the mo, and finally decided after loads of yes and no(ing) with myself that i needed a Z in my life!
Id rather a Turbo but insurnce is a tad pricey - although not out of price range.
Question is i suppose, is the N/A Z, gonna be a lot quicker than my MR2 (175bhp N/a) anyone know? Anyone had any experience with both of these cars?
What is the standard BHP on a Z N/A?
Sorry, not that much knowledge about Z's apart that i want one!
Thanks in advance..
Ed