We can debate if you want but simply should we have invaded Iraq or are you against it?

Whether right or wrong without UN backing I find it strange that dear old Gordon Brown can find the odd 2 billion pounds from somewere to fund the war effort but can't find the money to improve the hospitals, education and give the old age pensioners a decent pension over here.

But they know best for we elected them not that theres much else to vote for

Yeah you're right Steve, but I know where all that extra cash has come from and I'm sure TT Tim may back me up on this.

 

Firstly IR-35 will have contributed a huge few billion in stealth tax against people like me, also just before my Nan passed away a few years ago when I had just bought my Z I learnt that people in Kent were having a surcharge added onto their council tax statement. Around 40 squids I think in my grandparents case, apparently being used to look after the lovely assylum seekers that we all embrace so much as they are all so hard done by! :mad:

 

So that's just what I know to be true.

Originally posted by Timmy_Turbo

200 plus viewed and only 27 votes. FFS, is that all the paid up members this board has? SAD!!! LOL :D

 

It just goes to prove conclusively that this vote is inconclusive.

 

If 200 people viewed and only 27 voted then it is not representative of the wider viewpoint is it?

 

Correct me if im wrong.

Originally posted by Timmy_Turbo

Firstly IR-35

 

Now don't get me started!

 

(p.s. I'm one of the people who haven't voted. Since Monsieour Turbot started a poll asking for a boycott of polls when I set up a poll asking whether Nelson was mad or not [or something like that], I'm now boycotting his poll!)

Originally posted by senna

It just goes to prove conclusively that this vote is inconclusive.

 

If 200 people viewed and only 27 voted then it is not representative of the wider viewpoint is it?

 

Correct me if im wrong.

 

Nope, what it shows is that a) maybe people didn't want to vote or that b) they couldn't! ROFL :D

 

Still a majority vote for YES though, would you agree??? ;)

Originally posted by Timmy_Turbo

Nope, what it shows is that a) maybe people didn't want to vote or that b) they couldn't! ROFL :D

 

Still a majority vote for YES though, would you agree??? ;)

 

As people couldnt vote unless they paid up, does this make Craig a dictator? Should we should bomb him?

 

I tried this morning on the A217 but the Vitara's guidance system missed him!

Originally posted by senna

It just goes to prove conclusively that this vote is inconclusive.

 

If 200 people viewed and only 27 voted then it is not representative of the wider viewpoint is it?

 

Correct me if im wrong.

Not really true as the page registers a hit every time someone looks at it no? Now if someone posts when i myself go through the recent posts i look at most of them, so i have looked at this about 9 times now.

 

Poll speaks for itself really, you cant argue with facts lol.

And if the anti war lot are to scared to post on a forum poll, well then errmm lol (sad) comes to mind.

Although its a worry as to the repercussions of starting this war i do agree with it, it just shows the weapons inspectors were a waste of time really, makes you wonder what other weapons and how many of them he has, also whether airplanes will crash/poison dropped, poss water polution etc for years to come after this.

However the very fact he displayed his scuds makes it v worthwhile, and i fear for our kids future had we sat back and done nothing, and let them con us into believing they had no weapons of mass destruction untill we found one day the unpleasant way that they HAD, that thought is terrifying.

PPs by waste of time i mean that this should have been done last time, ten yrs ago or however long ago it was when we last went in it should have been completed then