Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
do you think this is posible on a full tank of petrol with sensible driving in a N/A

 

I just done more than that on a tank with driving in a sensible manor, if you want it confirming, Hollandrob81 will back me up on it.

Posted
I think Zeds' have a 70 litre tank. If so that equates to 15.38 gallons. So you need to average 13.65mpg.

In short, yes!!

 

60 litres methinks Daffy, that's all I could get in when I filled up to the brim recently :biggrin:

Not sure if the touring estates have a 70 litre tank for more range :clown:

Posted

no your right..thats the kinkardine bridge route

going the other route adds another 30 miles or so on to our jorney

but i thought we were gona go and meet everyone else..but then again iv not slept much and been working like f00k so that could explain alot

Posted (edited)

At a a steady pace you could do that on half a tank !

 

400 miles on a full tank is still only 25mpg, and closer to 30mpg is easily achievable.

 

A full tank aint cheap though - £90-£100 (depending on price of fuel) , 210 miles should cost you about £50

 

All Z's have a 72 litre tank.....not all Z's have a reliable fuel gauge though.

Edited by Yowser
Posted
At a a steady pace you could do that on half a tank !

 

400 miles on a full tank is still only 25mpg, and closer to 30mpg is easily achievable.

 

A full tank aint cheap though - £90-£100 (depending on price of fuel) , 210 miles should cost you about £50

 

All Z's have a 72 litre tank.....not all Z's have a reliable fuel gauge though.

 

Are those mpg's you quote for an n/a? I don't get anywhere near that, even on a motorway run. Slicktop TT in my case.

Posted
Are those mpg's you quote for an n/a? I don't get anywhere near that, even on a motorway run. Slicktop TT in my case.

 

Yeh, zhoodyx said he had an NA. On a long run, taking it steady.

 

Although technically the TT is more economical at a given cruising speed than the NA, and many of us have seen 30mpg over a long steady motorway journey, its harder to achieve overall becuase anytime you accelerate and enter boost it gulps the fuel down. Plus that go pedal is far too addictive :)

Posted
Yeh, zhoodyx said he had an NA. On a long run, taking it steady.

 

Although technically the TT is more economical at a given cruising speed than the NA, and many of us have seen 30mpg over a long steady motorway journey, its harder to achieve overall becuase anytime you accelerate and enter boost it gulps the fuel down. Plus that go pedal is far too addictive :)

 

I'm addicted allright :whistling: Off topic but noticed your new sig. Are those new wheels fitted or photoshopped? Looking good either way, 19's by the looks of it. Any bigger pics? :cool3:

Posted (edited)
I'm addicted allright :whistling: Off topic but noticed your new sig. Are those new wheels fitted or photoshopped? Looking good either way, 19's by the looks of it. Any bigger pics? :cool3:

 

Photoshopped, They are currently sitting on the floor of my spare room lol

More pics in my rides I think. I probably photoshopped them too big, they are 18"

Edited by Yowser

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use