current people on temporary bans - 2

t-pot

b19rks

 

members who have been subscribed who are banned permanently - 4

chunk

jefftt

matty

timmy_turbo

 

 

plus about 20 or so aliases of the snake and dangerous dave and people who have come on here to trade/rip members off.

 

of course if i have missed any please let me know, i'm not adding registered members to the list of permanent bans as most of these were people who only posted once or twice and were banned for breaking the trade AUP or for bing AE's

I'd just like to take this opportunity to say.... Dangerous Dave...what a C0CK!!!!!!!!!

 

/fin

current people on temporary bans - 2

t-pot

b19rks

 

members who have been subscribed who are banned permanently - 4

chunk

jefftt

matty

timmy_turbo

 

 

plus about 20 or so aliases of the snake and dangerous dave and people who have come on here to trade/rip members off.

 

of course if i have missed any please let me know, i'm not adding registered members to the list of permanent bans as most of these were people who only posted once or twice and were banned for breaking the trade AUP or for bing AE's

 

Why was b19rks banned?

Wasn't Scottywil booted out because of the calender debacle?

nope he left in shame.

 

and can we PLEASE give this a ****ing rest. it old news already

 

Not getting at you Mike, just people droning on over it all.

If you want to assess the situation more clearly Mike it might be more enlightening to pull and post the ban logs for the last year (or even two years to be thorough) to plot increases/decreases.

If you want to assess the situation more clearly Mike it might be more enlightening to pull and post the ban logs for the last year (or even two years to be thorough) to plot increases/decreases.

 

i can't do that, but people with permanent bans generally have been banned twice before, its a 3 strike out rule thats why we get so much flack

Why was b19rks banned?

 

 

anti-community spirit, says he doesnt like it here so he doesnt need to come here now for 10 days, its listed in subscribed forum

nope he left in shame.

 

and can we PLEASE give this a ****ing rest. it old news already

 

Not getting at you Mike, just people droning on over it all.

 

sorry chris, unfortunately it needs to be posted, just to prove to the member ship this place is not what the few are jumping around saying it is, you can't argue with hard statistical facts, but unfortunately they will try.

anti-community spirit, says he doesnt like it here so he doesnt need to come here now for 10 days, its listed in subscribed forum

Well it seems like the moderators decide what anti-comunity spirit is, even if the comunity itself seems to disagree. What is highlighted in the above certanly doesn't seem to qualify under a bannable offence in my opinion.

Maybe the best thing to do is talk about zed related things and use 300zx.co.uk for it's technical resources? :smash:

What makes me laugh is this.............

Loads of members argue that the committee dont give out enough information on this subject. Mike posts an update on the situation and already he is being critised???

 

Well done Mike. IMO its a good idea.

I never thought this place was ban-happy. Just it was a shame Chunk was banned (for whatever reason) as he was a pillar of the 300zx.co.uk community IMHO.

 

 

Not having a go at you at all Mike - I'm all for openess.

current people on temporary bans - 2

t-pot

b19rks

 

members who have been subscribed who are banned permanently - 4

chunk

jefftt

matty

timmy_turbo

 

 

plus about 20 or so aliases of the snake and dangerous dave and people who have come on here to trade/rip members off.

 

of course if i have missed any please let me know, i'm not adding registered members to the list of permanent bans as most of these were people who only posted once or twice and were banned for breaking the trade AUP or for bing AE's

 

I am not up to date of why chunk was banned but I wholeheartedly agree with Jeff's ban

he had lots of chances to redeem himself and he stills get's publicity here well he also did a lot lot of stuff that was really crap :rolleyes: )

 

I don't know about anyone else

 

It's good to know Mike what is going on, no need loads detail If I am interested i'll ask

I am not up to date of why chunk was banned but I wholeheartedly agree with Jeff's ban

he had lots of chances to redeem himself and he stills get's publicity here well he also did a lot lot of stuff that was really crap :rolleyes: )

 

I don't know about anyone else

 

It's good to know Mike what is going on, no need loads detail If I am interested i'll ask

here here.

hmm, always thought chunk's posts were decent. what happened to him? just out of interest...

i have never had a prob with jeffTT

 

could sum1 please PM with the details why he was banned

 

i have always used him so this would be helpfull to me

 

thank you :)

I think there was some falling out with him and the clever lads a long time ago.

b19rks was banned ???

i think leigh's suggestion is spot on! how about posting a complete ban log for the past two years. if you can't, why not? i don't see a problem with it.

because i am limited by the system ya5een,

as posted in similiar thread

 

ok guys any chance we can brush this crap under the carpet now as the whole non z related site seems to be awash with such threads about bannings, reasonings stats etc. to be honest if any one got any issues ref the way the club/ forum is maintained, maybe a quick pm to a mod maybe?? i really do think now this is seriously starting to take the pi55 and take over the site

 

rant over

because i am limited by the system ya5een,

how far back can you go then Mike?

according to the AUP:

 

A Temporary ban remains on file for a period of twelve times the length of the ban. After that period the strike is removed.

 

so, seeing as a second temporary ban is for a month that means the ban log must go back at least a year.

 

how about posting the ban log from the last year?

according to the AUP:

 

 

 

so, seeing as a second temporary ban is for a month that means the ban log must go back at least a year.

 

how about posting the ban log from the last year?

 

Sounds fair. It might clear the whole issue up and allow us to move on "again". Are the reasons for the ban going to accompany the names on the list?

according to the AUP:

 

 

 

so, seeing as a second temporary ban is for a month that means the ban log must go back at least a year.

 

how about posting the ban log from the last year?

 

 

the log file needs cleaning up, lots of nasty things written in their about world domination,

the log file needs cleaning up, lots of nasty things written in their about world domination,

thought you said not to tell anyone about that

 

tomorrow pinky we take over the world :smash: