Spoke earlier to my mechanic, and he agrees with me that I would be better modding the 200SX and leave the 300ZX as stock for now. He is a sensible guy as he strongly recommends I get he suspension and brakes uprated first.

 

He has loads of experience modding 200SX's, and says I could easily take it from ~170BHP to ~250BHP. Happy days !!

 

Maybe I should start visiting a 200SX forum as well !!

Originally posted by dunk300zxtt:

Timmy can I suck you C*ck too, being as I am being accussed the more the merrier.

 

Just not Captain Caveman.

 

Mrs dunk300zxtt(Wendy)

 

LMFCO

 

Yes please Mrs!

 

Can I come all over yer baps aswell?

 

Ohhhh do it to me baby! Shhhhh, don't tell Robert or he will have my nuts for conkers! ROFL

 

 

 

------------------

"Life sucks. Get a F**king helmet, okay?"

Denis Leary

Originally posted by Nelson MainFella:

You've stopped arguing because you can't.

 

I wasn't threatening you from my keyboard, merely saying it would be interesting to meet you !! there's a big difference - you should know that !!

 

Darwin Award ? - that's all you know isn't it ?!!

 

You appreciate there is a point where you stop arguing with an idiot because eventually people dont know who the idiot is? you asked some questions, i queried your facts them and all of a sudden you want to "meet me at the next meet" lmao

so i herby stop arguing because ****ing hell you take the cake with stupidity,but then so long as you dont give tech advise on a car you dont own i suppose its all right lol.

Timmy why don't we get together with Warren and have a free for all session.

 

But I must bring the horsewhip and be in charge.

 

BUT no cavemen allowed.

 

I only like big d*cks and brains.

 

Hugs and Kisses

 

Mrs dunk300zxtt(Wendy)

 

This service is for free to those who are invited

 

[This message has been edited by dunk300zxtt (edited 29-09-2002).]

ROFLMFAO

 

He does own a 300 I've seen it.

 

Come on baby(Mrs Funk300) light my fire baby!

 

I'm in love and will joust Rob when I meet him at the next gathering of Jap metal for the honour and love of Mrs Dunk!

 

 

 

------------------

"Life sucks. Get a F**king helmet, okay?"

Denis Leary

Originally posted by 300z:

You appreciate there is a point where you stop arguing with an idiot because eventually people dont know who the idiot is? you asked some questions, i queried your facts them and all of a sudden you want to "meet me at the next meet" lmao

so i herby stop arguing because ****ing hell you take the cake with stupidity,but then so long as you dont give tech advise on a car you dont own i suppose its all right lol.

 

 

FACT - you insulted me because you are a coward and would not do it face to face -if you said the things above to me to my face I would fookin hurt you !

 

You have misunderstood my comments/arguments and then proceeded to SLAG me off, hoping you could climb on the back of the other guy's criticism of me. but I repeat you are now resorting to insults rather than arguments to back up your comments, hoping that in all the confusion people think you are a cool dude who can rip people to pieces who get facts wrong. Even if my facts and arguments were all crap -I did not deserve your attack - that renders you (and Wendy for supportng you) as a$$holes.

 

We had a previous altication? and I was prepared to forgive and forget, but here you are again, ATTACKING me in a nasty, unprovoked way.

 

I am not a meek dubass who you can walkover, Warren, you should be more careful what you say. I hope anyone else reading this can see who the prick is.

 

Originally posted by dunk300zxtt:

Timmy why don't we get together with Warren and have a free for all session.

 

But I must bring the horsewhip and be in charge.

 

 

Mrs dunk300zxtt(Wendy)

 

This service is for free to those who are invited

 

[This message has been edited by dunk300zxtt (edited 29-09-2002).]

 

ROFL

 

Yeah but he's into Hamster love(Roll VT Errol) LMFAO

 

I just want you! All to myself...ohhhhhh I've been such a bad Turbo...really naughty and need punishing! LMFAO

 

 

 

------------------

"Life sucks. Get a F**king helmet, okay?"

Denis Leary

F1 cars are 2999CC engines, not ver big for a 1000bhp engine. And yes they can get that high without all the restrictions.

 

Lamborghini engine weighs over 500lb and that is for a racing engine which will be lighter than its domestic cousin.

Also the most powerful Lamborghini car is the VT-TwinTurbo and was tuned down to 900bhp to make it more reliable, even though when they tested it it ran at 1,100bhp with no problems.

 

F1 engines are light weight because they make them lightweight materials from the start. I bet 1 piston will cost more than what most of us earn in a year.

 

I also fail to see how you can compare a F1 engine which cost over £1,000,000 each just to make, not adding on the cost of development, with a mass produced engine which was made at the lowest possible price.

 

Rally car engine sizes are NOT optimised for for the best power out put. I suggest you read the rules of the WRC before you state facts of what you obvioulsy know nothing about.

 

I watched a top gear with 5 supercars and a Caterham testing 0-60 1/4 mile 1/2 mile and 2 mile times.

I thought the Caterham would win the 0-60 but it didnt. It was 2nd to last. The car was too light.

 

Stuart

YES I AM READING IT LOUD AND CLEAR YOU ARE DEFINATLY A PRIZE P*ICK.

 

I do not mind being an ass as you say, but at least I am not being as big a p*ick as you are.

 

Face it you know F*ck all, are F*ck all and will never be F*ck all.

 

NO Hugs or Kisses

 

Mrs dunk300zxtt(Wendy)

ROFL

 

Yep and Ron Jeremy is a porn star! Anything new then????

 

FFS you lot...can you stop it! I am crying this end! ROFL

 

Who gives a flying fcuk?

 

 

 

 

------------------

"Life sucks. Get a F**king helmet, okay?"

Denis Leary

Originally posted by dunk300zxtt:

YES I AM READING IT LOUD AND CLEAR YOU ARE DEFINATLY A PRIZE P*ICK.

 

I do not mind being an ass as you say, but at least I am not being as big a p*ick as you are.

 

Face it you know F*ck all, are F*ck all and will never be F*ck all.

 

NO Hugs or Kisses

 

Mrs dunk300zxtt(Wendy)

 

LOL

 

But what about me?

 

 

 

------------------

"Life sucks. Get a F**king helmet, okay?"

Denis Leary

So whats better then auto or manual?

 

------------------

Originally posted by SRRAE:

F1 cars are 2999CC engines, not ver big for a 1000bhp engine. And yes they can get that high without all the restrictions.

 

Lamborghini engine weighs over 500lb and that is for a racing engine which will be lighter than its domestic cousin.

Also the most powerful Lamborghini car is the VT-TwinTurbo and was tuned down to 900bhp to make it more reliable, even though when they tested it it ran at 1,100bhp with no problems.

 

F1 engines are light weight because they make them lightweight materials from the start. I bet 1 piston will cost more than what most of us earn in a year.

 

I also fail to see how you can compare a F1 engine which cost over £1,000,000 each just to make, not adding on the cost of development, with a mass produced engine which was made at the lowest possible price.

 

Rally car engine sizes are NOT optimised for for the best power out put. I suggest you read the rules of the WRC before you state facts of what you obvioulsy know nothing about.

 

I watched a top gear with 5 supercars and a Caterham testing 0-60 1/4 mile 1/2 mile and 2 mile times.

I thought the Caterham would win the 0-60 but it didnt. It was 2nd to last. The car was too light.

 

Stuart

 

srrae i remember that video, was it the one with the Porshe 911 turbo, Cerbrea (that apperently was hugely modified), Aston martin, Dodge Viper and JPE? oh and Lotus?

that was pretty good race.

Wierd how allt he big cc'd engines blew away the poor old two litre (which was the least stock of any of them.

 

 

 

[This message has been edited by 300z (edited 29-09-2002).]

Hold your self in Timmy I will get around to you after I finish with Warren and the hampster.

 

My god he is wellhung, could not get it all in my mouth in one go. I need a hampster like that.;D And as for Warrenn well thats all I am at liberty to say at the moment.

 

Mrs dunk300zxtt(MISS WHIPLASH)

Originally posted by dunk300zxtt:

Timmy why don't we get together with Warren and have a free for all session.

 

But I must bring the horsewhip and be in charge.

 

BUT no cavemen allowed.

 

I only like big d*cks and brains.

 

Hugs and Kisses

 

Mrs dunk300zxtt(Wendy)

 

This service is for free to those who are invited

 

[This message has been edited by dunk300zxtt (edited 29-09-2002).]

 

Please clarify free for all lmao, the thaught of backing up Timmy is a bit of a wierd one, not sure if ill be stepping on MAC'S toes he he he.

And yes my hamster is actually to well hung

 

 

[This message has been edited by 300z (edited 29-09-2002).]

are all car forums full of people talkin' shyte ?!! FFS !

 

I'M TALKING ABOUT POWER TO WEIGHT RATIO OF THE OVERALL CAR !!!!!

 

COMPRENDEZ ?!

 

For a given car weight (car minus engine) there will be an optimal engine size (or 2 if you count N/A vs. TT/single Turbo). If the car is to achieve a fastest 0-60, the lighter it can be , the better. The lighter it can be, the smaller will be the optimal engine size, because a smaller engine gives out more HP for it's MASS (greater power-to-weight ratio). But the power-to-weight ratio of the OVERALL car is the critical factor, so for a heavier car, a larger engine is required, even though it is less efficient than a smaller engine. There comes a point though when the extra mass from a larger engine is more of a disadvantage than the extra power is an advatage, so it's undesirable. BUT, because the overall power-to-weight ratio is inferior for the heavier car it will not be as fast as the smaller car. For high top speeds however, other things come into play like aerodynamics and a larger, more powerful engine ARE required to overcome drag. This is the role of a 300ZXTT for example. Comparing 'normal' cars with exotic F1/supercars like McClaren F1's is not a like-with-like comparison, so is invalid, as very expensive materials are used to lighten the engines, and expensive mods to raise engine power for a given CC.

Originally posted by dunk300zxtt:

Hold your self in Timmy I will get around to you after I finish with Warren and the hampster.

 

My god he is wellhung, could not get it all in my mouth in one go. I need a hampster like that.;D And as for Warrenn well thats all I am at liberty to say at the moment.

 

Mrs dunk300zxtt(MISS WHIPLASH)

 

 

ROFL(Cumming in me boxers)

 

Trust me love, he'll(Warren) will blow his gasketts long before I will! ROFL

 

Can I ask you some personal questions?

 

Well not so personal as Max Power seem to ask them all the time!

 

A) Pink or Brown?

 

B) Spit or Swallow?

 

C) Do you flick the bean?

 

D) Ever had a threesome?(Hamsters exempt!)

 

E) Own any toys?

 

F) Ever been anywhere on the internet without so many losers?

 

LMFAO

 

LOVE YOU MRS WHIPLASH!

 

 

 

 

------------------

"Life sucks. Get a F**king helmet, okay?"

Denis Leary

 

------------------

Originally posted by Nelson MainFella:

I'M TALKING ABOUT POWER TO WEIGHT RATIO OF THE OVERALL CAR !!!!!

 

 

ok genious , what is the power to weight of a nissan 300zx, and the power to weight of a nissan 200sx?

(please dont punch me for asking )

Warren are ready for round two yet.

 

Hugs and kisses

 

Mrsdunk300zxtt(MISS WHIPLASH)

 

P.S Timmy ALL of the above, and I mean All

Originally posted by SRRAE:

 

I watched a top gear with 5 supercars and a Caterham testing 0-60 1/4 mile 1/2 mile and 2 mile times.

I thought the Caterham would win the 0-60 but it didnt. It was 2nd to last. The car was too light.

 

Stuart

 

The Caterham does not have a TURBOCHARGED 2- litre engine which is what I am on about. IF it did, it would have probably have wooped all those cars in 0-60, as in N'A form it would probably have less than half the power of those other cars !!

Originally posted by 300z:

 

Please clarify free for all lmao, the thaught of backing up Timmy is a bit of a wierd one, not sure if ill be stepping on MAC'S toes he he he.

And yes my hamster is actually to well hung

 

 

[This message has been edited by 300z (edited 29-09-2002).][/b]

 

Oh now why bring me into it FFS?

 

 

 

------------------

KEEP IT SIDEWAYS!

Originally posted by Nelson MainFella:

The Caterham does not have a TURBOCHARGED 2- litre engine which is what I am on about. IF it did, it would have probably have wooped all those cars in 0-60, as in N'A form it would probably have less than half the power of those other cars !!

 

but then youd be able to modify the toher cars no? this was about production cars, and that 7 was making 250bhp ?

 

 

Originally posted by Nelson MainFella:

The Caterham does not have a TURBOCHARGED 2- litre engine which is what I am on about. IF it did, it would have probably have wooped all those cars in 0-60, as in N'A form it would probably have less than half the power of those other cars !!

 

but then youd be able to modify the toher cars no? this was about production cars, and that 7 was making 250bhp ?

 

 

Originally posted by dunk300zxtt:

P.S Timmy ALL of the above, and I mean All

 

LMFAO

 

Where do I go from here?

 

You have me sold! ROFL

 

 

 

 

------------------

"Life sucks. Get a F**king helmet, okay?"

Denis Leary

Yes thats the one Warren.

 

The 4.6 TVR won

Then the 3.6 Twin Turbo

Then the 2 tonne 6 litre Aston Martin

 

Hear are some interesting facts I found.

 

200SX 93+

Power = 179bhp

Weight = 2734lb (1.22t)

CC = 1998

BHP per Tonne = 164.6

BHP per Litre = 89.5

 

200SX 89-93

Power = 178

Weight = 2703 (1.20t)

CC = 1809

BHP per Tonne = 147.5

BHP per Litre = 98.4

 

300ZX 90+

Power = 300bhp

Weight = 3485lb (1.55t)

CC = 2960

BHP per Tonne = 192.8

BHP per Litre = 101.3