OK lets end this argument once and for all

Technically - no

 

But we all know otherwise :bow:

 

J

Yeah I like it.

:bow: super car maybe not ! A superb car definately just my opinion plus my mates at work who cant catch it with their Scooby`s :bow:

fooking hell. there where 3 polls before i finished

Sorry, I believe it's a 'fast GT' in today's current climate and a good one at that. :)

was classed as a junior supercar from what i have read up on. if it had been rear engined then yes, thats the deciding factor..

i my eyes a super car in your eyes you can think whatever you want i dont give a fook

 

a car can be what ever you think it to be, one critic likes it one doesnt its up to you as an individual to decide

 

like the veryon a true supercar?

 

for me its not cause couldnt afford to race about in it (never mind buy one) in roman abromoviches case, probably yes cause he could afford to race about in it and if there was something he didnt like about it he would buy the VAG and get the desingers to change things on it

 

so i dont think this poll really will "end once and for all", cause some think yes and some think no

Sorry but no! I love them to bits, but no...

 

Chris..

What defines a supercar, i go out in my motor and people stare, people hear it, these 2 can be put to any modified car but when you floor it and it goes sideways and launches up the road i think it becomes a supercar caus your average piece of turd doesnt do that you also sit in a slung low position in a car that was built to slip through the air better than most cars and to be quite honest i havent spent the price of a house owning it so maybe call it a budget supercar.........................at the end of the day its a supercar to me so fook the rest !!!!!

When it was first introduced it was.

i voted no cos its not £100k. if it was a little faster and £80k+ then it would be

I'd call it a Grand Tourer too. Like an Aston Martin or Maserati 3200.

Not quite a supercar - although it is quite super!

no, its not a supercar. Supercars are outrageous in every way, they should look so extravagent they are almost ugly, be stupidly expensive, and have a ridiculously powerful engine.

no, its not a supercar. Supercars are outrageous in every way, they should look so extravagent they are almost ugly, be stupidly expensive, and have a ridiculously powerful engine.

 

 

 

EH ?? i thought mine was !!! :) :)

i voted no cos its not £100k. if it was a little faster and £80k+ then it would be

 

How can it not be. A supercar isn't defined by its price or its make.

 

Any car with a performance of 0-60 in only 5.5sec standard. A top speed of 180 miles per hour cant be defined as anything else. There are plenty of porsches, farraries, and lambo's with no where near the performance of a zed yet they are classed as supercars.

SO WHY NOT A ZED :rant: :rant: :rant: OVER

See post 27 here

 

http://www.300zx.co.uk/forums/showthread.php?t=62626&page=2

 

Richard :rolleyes: :tongue:

How can it not be. A supercar isn't defined by its price or its make.

 

Actually i'd say its entirely on the price and make..

Actually i'd say its entirely on the price and make..

 

Also limited production, the construction method (hand assembly), useage of exotic materials, 8, 10, 12 + cylinders, mid engined configuration.

 

These things affect the final price somewhat, and only a very few car makers work with V12s, carbon fiber and have staff who can literally hand-beat car panels to shape.

Also limited production, the construction method (hand assembly), useage of exotic materials, 8, 10, 12 + cylinders, mid engined configuration.

 

These things affect the final price somewhat, and only a very few car makers work with V12s, carbon fiber and have staff who can literally hand-beat car panels to shape.

 

 

Once again ?? my car has had hand assembly and i seriously doubt every zed came off the production line without a jap tech fiddling to sort summat out !!!! :tongue:

How can it not be. A supercar isn't defined by its price or its make.

 

Any car with a performance of 0-60 in only 5.5sec standard. A top speed of 180 miles per hour cant be defined as anything else. There are plenty of porsches, farraries, and lambo's with no where near the performance of a zed yet they are classed as supercars.

SO WHY NOT A ZED :rant: :rant: :rant: OVER

 

Very well put Dave! I'm with you on that :duffer:

How can it not be. A supercar isn't defined by its price or its make.

 

Any car with a performance of 0-60 in only 5.5sec standard. A top speed of 180 miles per hour cant be defined as anything else. There are plenty of porsches, farraries, and lambo's with no where near the performance of a zed yet they are classed as supercars.

SO WHY NOT A ZED :rant: :rant: :rant: OVER

 

my reasoning is: cars like Enzos, Saleens, Veyrons, Cerberas, McLarens etc. are supercars. the Z is damn fast but just not in the same category as those. so its the next one down. what that category is i dont know.

an interesting side argument would be: Evo 7 FQ-400, 0-60 in 3.4, is it a supercar tho? [no cos its only about £40k and it doesnt have that coupe look. discuss]

Strictly speaking no, but it certainly makes you feel super, which is good enough for me :D

No They Are Not Compared To Some,but They Are The Next Step Down But With Some Serious Money Spent They Can Be Very Special ,you Can Always Tell If Shes Good Just Drive Through Town And Your Have Your Answer

Recon the Z32 is how a super car should have been defined. Fast enough so scare all but the stupid. Well built to the point you can still buy a 14 year old one and USE IT!! Look like a proper sports car..

"YES IT FOOKIN WELL IS"