Well i have a contdown conundrum.

 

Just bought a z 7 weeks ago and i love it BUT.

 

Its a n/a auto :cry:

 

An thinking of going to get it made into a manual but its 1500 quid , and am about to spend 1000 on upgrades cam belt etc.

 

But i am now thinking sell this one and get a turbo and start from there.

 

Only thing is that this has les than 50k on it .

 

what to do go turbo or stick with this and make her lovely ( well more lovely)

 

Is there that big a difference in turbo and non ???

 

Help i am totally cabbaged, and kylie (the car) is on ati depresants.

not driven a twin turbo? try one, although if you cant afford one then dont because you will need one like an addict needs to shoot up lol :p

not driven a twin turbo? try one, although if you cant afford one then dont because you will need one like an addict needs to shoot up lol :p

 

LMFAO, How true is that.......... :D

Bin the normally ar$e-pirated and get a satan wagon instead!

 

I wouldn't spend a grand large on that thing when you could sell it and probably get a good price for it if the mileage is that low, get a twin tub instead. I really don't understand why anyone would get a car that has the looks but had it's b0110x removed at the factory by the Nelson vet! SNIP! Arrggggghhhhhhh I have no gonads...I must be gay! LOL :D

.....Arrggggghhhhhhh I have no gonads...I must be gay! LOL :D

 

 

We've known that for years timmy :D Hey, at least you're honest :D

Cheeky f\/cker! ROFL :mac1:

Nitrous? Well under a grand and an easy 75bhp I guess.

This comes up and I try to shut up because there are better men than me to make a comment. I suppose this has been said many times before but it depends what you want to use the car for. I use it every day, and I think maybe it would be asking for it to try to do 16,000 miles in a year in a TT. But I still want a TT.

 

I love my NA, but I think there are too many other more 'normal' cars with a similar performance. I'm not sure like what, but scabby saloons and estates that could claim better performance and maybe even a lighter weight. Still love my car though.

 

I just saw the guy next door go out in his car and this is what made me think about this- He has a Honda Del Sol, which I believe has about 170 at the flywheel (?) and must be about 1/3 lighter than my NA or something. Mine is about 222 at the flywheel (190 at the wheels), and I do seriously worry sometimes if he could have a go in his Del Sol. If i worry about that, then maybe my car isn't powerful enough ;) .

 

Sounds quite a nice little car, but I would NOT want to be shown up in it.

i have previosly had an na swb and now have a tt swb and i had more trouble with the na tbh head gasket, misfires maybe just unlucky i

now have a tt with ~350 bhp and it kicks ass the trouble is with a turbo its like having an espresso coffee with sugar and cream compared to a nescafe ! but the na was also a nice motordepends on what u want i guess hth

I have prob had more than my fair share of bad luck with both of my TT's but I still wouldn't swap em for the world as you all know when they are running properly and everything is set up properly on them there are not many cars that come close to them. In a nutshell the Twin Turbo Z is truly one of the most underestimated and underated supercars ever....IMHO

I have prob had more than my fair share of bad luck with both of my TT's but I still wouldn't swap em for the world as you all know when they are running properly and everything is set up properly on them there are not many cars that come close to them. In a nutshell the Twin Turbo Z is truly one of the most underestimated and underated supercars ever....IMHO

 

2true bud ;)