http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/west_yorkshire/6195581.stm

 

:shock:

well maybe you should have read the whole fookin thread and realised it aint a jibe at muslim or non fookin muslms, its a jibe at our fantastic :rolleyes: airport security and immigration laws :headvswal :headvswal :headvswal

 

 

Stella, Way to go mate, either you have had a bad day, your pissed or your just missed the point. Ironically by incorrectly accusing my post of failure at sticking to the original and subsequent posts topic, you yourself have missed my point completely. So here are a few things you seem to of overlooked because you did not take the time to digest what the newspaper article and my subsequent request communicates. The news article has nothing to do with our “airport security and immigration laws” and everything to do with my point I made.

 

Firstly its pure speculation, "Mustaf Jamma reportedly evaded checks at Heathrow" by newspaper reporters who admit it is theoretical and site “sources” as their means of proof "Some newspaper reports have suggested" which I clearly pointed out in my post. So how can our security be responsible for something that did not happen?

Secondly the news article is needlessly xenophobic and racially inflammatory. It’s aimed at a particular race on the basis of rumour, this is the definition of racism in this case it is blatantly breeding xenophobic doctrine.

Thirdly, See it for what it really is, a smokescreen to hide a politicians agenda and sell papers on the back of fashionable public opinion regarding immigration and present prejudice towards Muslims. Its spin, plain and simple to get one party out and another party in and nothing will change and the poor policewoman will still be without justice “its a jibe at our fantastic airport security and immigration laws :headvswal ” no its not.

Finally, my post was on the news article itself nothing before or after, I did not attack anyone just asked people to see that article for what it really was. My aim was to highlight the inadequacies of the article and implore you to see a bigger picture regarding jumping on the racist or xenophobic bandwagon which the particular article permeates.

You will not get any complaint out of me regarding improving our immigration laws but lay the blame at the door of the politicians and not the services, they are doing the job as best they can under the laws you and I allow them with the funding government gives them. Baring draconian measures that take away basic human rights and freedoms there is very little they can do unless the laws change, but racism and xenophobia are not the answer.

 

As you can see I have taken my time over this reply, a couple of hours have gone into it as my first rendition would have been blanked out by the swearing sensor I was that incensed over the tone of your post.

Exactly this isn't an anti muslim thread its having a pop at how useless our security is AGAIN letting someone through they shouldn't have

 

 

to do that they would have to stop everyone, you cant and even then some would slip through, 10K people through Heathrow per day, 20-30 seconds a person minimum, you do the math. And this sint an anti muslim thread. the flipping news article is. Its concept is of how he got out, not how he got in as there is no knowledge of how he entered the bloody country, or at least it hasnt been disclosed.

Where in any of all this have you heard anyone ask, what message are we going to send about how much we want to find him and return him for trial, if of course he doesnt die running.

Oh dear it seems the Daily Mail may have jumped gun which is unlike its usual " seeing both sides" stance :rolleyes:

 

As reported there is no evidence to back up this story

yes he may have escaped this way but he may have also been savagley eaten by a werewolf

lol

 

i have read further on other sites.

 

he wasnt the person that killed her, he's in jail, he isnt the person who organised it, he's on the run. Another robber has had his court overturned on lack of evidence, this guy?

Here here!!:bow::bow:

 

 

Stella, Way to go mate, either you have had a bad day, your pissed or your just missed the point. Ironically by incorrectly accusing my post of failure at sticking to the original and subsequent posts topic, you yourself have missed my point completely. So here are a few things you seem to of overlooked because you did not take the time to digest what the newspaper article and my subsequent request communicates. The news article has nothing to do with our “airport security and immigration laws” and everything to do with my point I made.

 

Firstly its pure speculation, "Mustaf Jamma reportedly evaded checks at Heathrow" by newspaper reporters who admit it is theoretical and site “sources” as their means of proof "Some newspaper reports have suggested" which I clearly pointed out in my post. So how can our security be responsible for something that did not happen?

Secondly the news article is needlessly xenophobic and racially inflammatory. It’s aimed at a particular race on the basis of rumour, this is the definition of racism in this case it is blatantly breeding xenophobic doctrine.

Thirdly, See it for what it really is, a smokescreen to hide a politicians agenda and sell papers on the back of fashionable public opinion regarding immigration and present prejudice towards Muslims. Its spin, plain and simple to get one party out and another party in and nothing will change and the poor policewoman will still be without justice “its a jibe at our fantastic airport security and immigration laws :headvswal ” no its not.

Finally, my post was on the news article itself nothing before or after, I did not attack anyone just asked people to see that article for what it really was. My aim was to highlight the inadequacies of the article and implore you to see a bigger picture regarding jumping on the racist or xenophobic bandwagon which the particular article permeates.

You will not get any complaint out of me regarding improving our immigration laws but lay the blame at the door of the politicians and not the services, they are doing the job as best they can under the laws you and I allow them with the funding government gives them. Baring draconian measures that take away basic human rights and freedoms there is very little they can do unless the laws change, but racism and xenophobia are not the answer.

 

As you can see I have taken my time over this reply, a couple of hours have gone into it as my first rendition would have been blanked out by the swearing sensor I was that incensed over the tone of your post.

 

The point of a berka or what ever they are called is to hide the face Why?????.

 

coz their fookin ugly

 

If these people come to our country they should respect our laws as we would have to respect their's if we where in their country. You cant tatally blame these people, its US for sitting on our arses and moaning and doing nothing about it and allowing our stupid government to allow these people to exployet these laws because everyone is too scared to say or do anything, hence why this guy may or may not of escaped through customs. Everyone is entitelled to their beliefs except us in our own country as we are the infidelis in these peoples eyes, would we be allowed to build a church in their country? I think not! Well me for one is fooked off with this countries laws with 1 for them and 1 for us, and im not affraid to say it! But this post will proberbly get removed or i would get a ban for saying they are ugly, and that would be another case of PC and not allowed to have a say incase these people get offended

WTF

:confused:

 

THE STORY IS B0LLOX

Finally!!!! someone tells us what people who aren't thinking, are thinking!! thats the most structured and well grounded piece of writing ive seen for a long time!! :duffer: :wack:

 

 

coz their fookin ugly

 

If these people come to our country they should respect our laws as we would have to respect their's if we where in their country. You cant tatally blame these people, its US for sitting on our arses and moaning and doing nothing about it and allowing our stupid government to allow these people to exployet these laws because everyone is too scared to say or do anything, hence why this guy may or may not of escaped through customs. Everyone is entitelled to their beliefs except us in our own country as we are the infidelis in these peoples eyes, would we be allowed to build a church in their country? I think not! Well me for one is fooked off with this countries laws with 1 for them and 1 for us, and im not affraid to say it! But this post will proberbly get removed or i would get a ban for saying they are ugly, and that would be another case of PC and not allowed to have a say incase these people get offended