Does anyone know the tech spec for 300zx nasp?

 

In particular looking for 0-60, top end, MPG ect.

 

Had a quick scan under search but couldn't find anything.

Posted a couple of days ago bud. No idea on MPG though (its not something a zed owners really wants to think about ;))

 

NA

222 bhp

198 Ib/ft

0-60 : 7.0 secs

0-100 : 18.6 secs

Top speed : 140 mph

 

TT (Euro and Japan)

280 bhp - 300bhp

283 Ib/ft

0-60 : 5.5 secs

0-100 : 14.5 secs

Top speed : 170 mph + (Uk restricted to 155mph and Jap to 112mph)

Thanks, anyone know the MPG? Just trying to decide between a nasp and a Rover tomcat turbo.

200 to 220 miles on £50 of fuel usually for an NA.

But ask yourself how many people will stop and stare at the Rover compared to the 300?

Thanks, anyone know the MPG? Just trying to decide between a nasp and a Rover tomcat turbo.

 

if considering a Rover Turbo, why not Twin Turbo 300zx ?

 

The Rover and zed are like chalk and cheese. One is a cheap Sports coupe, the other is the Original Japenese supercar.

 

Somebody posted about getting an average 29mpg on a modified TT during long journey last week. The NA would be marginally better. Although in reality expect low-mid 20's on average.

The Rover and zed are like chalk and cheese. One is a cheap Sports coupe,

Actually its a CHEAP, OUTDATED sports coupe once made by a company who now have gone bust , because they persisted in making outdated crap that fell to pieces even before it left the showrooms. Belongs in a family line of cars of similar dismal quality n looks such as the 45 and all that 800 series crap.And dont get me started about the previous rubbish like 400 series!!

The surprise for me was not that Rover went bust, but the fact it didnt happen 10 years ago. Ya got that. :)

 

Now I prsonally dont have a problem with people buying Rovers... Its a free country and it aint my money your spending... so go ahead anyone who wants to.......

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Just dont park the fooker outside my house! :nono: :rofl:

Rover would have gone but longer than that if it wasn't for our GOV pouring OUR!! money into it to build rubbish.

Go for a Zed Tony,i'm getting about 25-30 mpg with my N/A,unmodified and "driving easy" LOL!! The money you spend on fuel for a Zed is nothing compared to the repair bills for a Rover

I would go for the TT but they are just out of my price range.

Tony

 

...I use my na every day - approx 30 mile round trip to work / back. £30's worth of fuel lasts for about 200 to 220 miles.

 

good luck

 

Jack

Hey Rovers weren't that bad. Ok so they weren't the coolest cars in the world and build quality isn't that good but I have been in a few and there are much worse cars out there. My mate had an MG ZS180 and it was a genuinely fun car to drive. The kind of car you could grab by the scuff of the neck and really throw around.

Getting back to the original point there is LOADS of information on this website (just found while aimlessy surfing.......for 300ZX of course! :D )

 

http://www.300zx.cl/

 

Lots of magazine scans, loads of roadtests, all the figures you can shake a stick at...

 

StuartR

Hope you get the TT that your looking for Tony,some TT Zeds can be pricey,but their worth every penny.I had a budget of between 4000-5000 and was open to either a TT or N/A and decided on the N/A due to using it every day,thought the TT would never be used to full potential as i'm a (slow driver)LOL....Anyway the Zed has been the best car by far and i've had Mr2's,Supras etc...Goodluck on finding your TT Zed,there's plenty out there.