if you are following the the F1 you will know what i mean

 

in my opinion they were team order's, ferrari should be penalised for what they have done AGAIN

 

i feel for massa, he drove faultlesly and he was told to let alonso past, alonso if he was any type of sportsman (which he isnt the sly backstabber) he would have gave the race to massa and not passed him

 

to me they should have let the two racer's race and let the better man come out the winner, its what all the other team;s have done

 

what do you's think???

There have always been team orders in F1 and there always will be. I agree with Eddie Jordan that they should just scrap the rule against team orders. And as Martin Brundle says "my strong advice to any established driver is to simply ignore the request, win the race, and handle the nuclear fallout afterwards."

 

It's an example of the Golden Rule: he who has the gold, makes the rules. Who pays the driver's wages?

 

And in 1957, drivers could even swop cars mid race! "Car #20: Tony Brooks (26 laps) and Stirling Moss (64 laps). They shared the 8 points for first place" British Grand Prix http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1957_British_Grand_Prix - wouldn't that shake up a boring race :D

Edited July 27, 201016 yr by Gio

And just read a little further - the 1957 British Grand Prix at Aintree looks like being a real pub quiz twister - "This was the first occasion that a British-built car won a World Championship race, a feat achieved with two British drivers at their home Grand Prix." It's a coinci-clasm, Professor.

one problem would be if you had a bet on Massa to win and he is told to move over:no:

 

LOL - that's your problem not theirs - you should have had the foresight to bet on the winner ! ;)

LOL - that's your problem not theirs - you should have had the foresight to bet on the winner ! ;)

 

lol never bet on the number two driver to win (unless your Mark Webber)