fspider

A few guys i know use this system. The guy they bought it from is called Rob Firreti, hes the guy speaking in this video. He runs a forum i am part of http://www.superspeeders.com/ Heres the vid

Boy them sun flares the sun is generating, sure has given the UK government a licence to oppress its citizens. How the hell do we as a people stand for these ridiculous proposals? Read the responces at the bottom of the page to gauge other countrys feelings about the UK. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/environment/carbon/6527970/Everyone-in-Britain-could-be-given-a-personal-carbon-allowance.html

Oh yes your right. So its acualy 38mph in reverse then. Now why does that sound as bad;)

Mate any car that is advertised as being able to do 60mph in reverse.....means its been thrashed IMO.:rofl:

I ment to say, i has no doubt the owner of the Miurawished he had an 11K bill:rofl:

I have no doubt that the owner of this recently crashed car had an 11K repair bill:eek:

In fact yes i do, although there are some cars the lift doors look good on. Lambo doors belong on a lambo IMO. I am of the opinion that the 300ZX has a fantastic design package. From the tail lights to the wonderful V6 engine. Which is one of the smoothest engines to grace a sports car IMO. The only thing i deem an acceptable mod on a 300zx is after market wheels. Why people play with the 300ZX lights i dont know, they are a classic design already. I have been in one of my Italians and have pulled along side a couple of 300ZXs with the "Ferrari style lights". I always give the thumbs up because i love them. But i do want to shake them and shout, "what have you done to the beautiful lights mam". :(

Doors dont suit it and i am not to sure about the red colour, silver may be a better colour for it. Though its still no SLR replacement IMO. Money on the new Gullwing or the new mclaren MP4??......i would go with the Mclaren MP4-12C i think. http://img33.imageshack.us/img33/1268/93563051.jpg

Mate i know all about the agreed value insurance scam. As well as my 1992 300zx i am also in the Ferrari community (10 years of ownership), by that definition i have alot of friends who own the marque to. So being exotic owners we are a tight arsed group who are terrified to loose a penny on, our in some cases investments. We like to THINK we check all the small print in our agreed insurance policy's, but even then we get the wool pulled over our eyes. We have to jump through all the hoops including sending in photographs of the car, and 2 independent valuations. In 2008 one of my close mates spun and crashed his 360CS which was valued at £110K he eventually got &103K. Another mate also in 2008 had his F430 stolen and never to be seen again, he lost 6K on the pay out. Both were insured by Footman and James who are regarded as leaders in agreed valued insurance policy's. I will say again, there policy's states. [ If your vehicle is lost or totally destroyed, we will pay up to the amount shown against this endorsement number on the schedule] There has been great discussion on certain Ferrari forums about this. I dont know what actually qualifies you for a full agreed payout with these companies, its still a bloody mystery.

Yea that siht was funny:D

Totaly agree.

Very good. The problem with that though is that now every one watches your posts very carefully for punctuation and spelling mistakes. Trust me every one slips:cool:

Please believe me that an agreed insurance policy is not worth the paper its written on. You will never get the agreed amount, they still make you an offer. For instance heres the wording on a Footman and James agreed valuation policy... [ If your vehicle is lost or totally destroyed, we will pay up to the amount shown against this endorsement number on the schedule] This is a con as their liability is limited and any club valuation is is a guide to the value only and a cap on any claim.

Repeted on sunday night.

Ah bloody dealers:(