http://www.future-technologies.co.uk/planetx/index.htm

 

if youve got 45 minutes free and you're feeling a little philosophical then read the above which was posted on another forum (no not a religious forum). it looks heavy at first but its easy to get into. not saying i agree with it (or that i dont) but its certainly inspiring! any comments?

http://www.future-technologies.co.uk/planetx/index.htm

 

if youve got 45 minutes free and you're feeling a little philosophical then read the above which was posted on another forum (no not a religious forum). it looks heavy at first but its easy to get into. not saying i agree with it (or that i dont) but its certainly inspiring! any comments?

that blows me away so much ive just saved it to my "desktop" :bow: :bow:

I'm quitting my job and moving to Thailand to shag myself to death.

 

That was great!!.

Very interesting reading.

sorry i like a conspiracy theory as much as the next man - but what a load of twaddle - sit down and read dan brown or kate mose they're more believable and a better read

 

or if you really love a conspriracy then read graham hanckock's fingerprint of the gods and more subsequently underworld

 

just my 2p :D

 

regards,

 

alex

Sorry, but I've read this type of "revelation" a hundred times over. They shoe-horn "facts" to explain "prophesy" but of course only mention those that work in the constraints of their ideology: imagine the number of things they had to leave out due to not being "on message"; they expone supposedly revelatory quasi-religio/scientific theories seemingly without any order, dashing like an excited child between, Sumerians, Judeo-Christian theology, Geo-Physics, Astonomy, Hopi prophecy, Pyramids (gotta love 'em, they're always a mainstay) etc, etc, etc. As CJ says, there are far more plausible "end-game" theories out there.

yeh

^^^^^^^

What he said

 

:shock: :shock: :shock:

 

What ever that was

:rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:

Sorry, but I've read this type of "revelation" a hundred times over. They shoe-horn "facts" to explain "prophesy" but of course only mention those that work in the constraints of their ideology: imagine the number of things they had to leave out due to not being "on message"; they expone supposedly revelatory quasi-religio/scientific theories seemingly without any order, dashing like an excited child between, Sumerians, Judeo-Christian theology, Geo-Physics, Astonomy, Hopi prophecy, Pyramids (gotta love 'em, they're always a mainstay) etc, etc, etc. As CJ says, there are far more plausible "end-game" theories out there.

 

well i have to disagree because in terms of pseudo-cartesian geometry there has been evidence found that....

 

...

 

**** it where's me Fosters? :duffer:

LMAO! :rofl:

 

Nurse! The meds are wearing off! :wack: :D

:rofl: Oh dear oh dear oh dear, run the opposite way and quick, the end is nigh yet again :rofl: