Hi all, tomorrow I am hoping to get my windscreen replaced!
3 months ago my windscreen developed a crack on the passenger’s side.
My insurance company told me to contact Autoglass which I did.
3 months later they informed me they could not source a windscreen.
It took me 2 days to track one down with YTW windscreens
And Pilkinton Glass can make them to order!
Now l have the windscreen with no clear precise instructions on how to get the side panels off without destroying them along with braking plastic clips & robber stoppers along the way that are nearly 30 years old.
Here are some photos
How to take off the side panel?
First lift the top up off the rail ! Do not bend it !,
When that is done the whole side panel slides out! Not with 30 years of dirt along the rails they don’t!
I have new side panels arriving at a cost of around £189
I have also ordered new side pillar trim Retainers as it suggested, but not needed !
Cost £216
The windscreen cost £654
Plus £200 windscreen fitted
Added insensitives £36 scuttle clips -square ones
£28 for new top plastic clips
All for love😀300ZX
By
arthur ·
World Most Bizarre Suicide.......
At the 1994 annual awards dinner given by the American Association for Forensic Science,
AAFS president Don Harper Mills astounded his audience in San Diego
with the legal complications of a bizarre death.
Here is the story: On 23 March 1994, the medical examiner viewed the body of Ronald Opus
and concluded that he died from a shotgun wound to the head.
The decedent had jumped from the top of a ten-story building
intending to commit suicide (he left a note indicating his despondency).
As he fell past the ninth floor, his life was interrupted by a shotgun blast
through a window, which killed him instantly.
Neither the shooter nor the decedent was aware that a safety net
had been erected at the eighth floor level to protect some window
washers and that Opus would not have been able to complete
his suicide anyway because of this. Ordinarily, Dr. Mills continued,
a person who sets out to commit suicide ultimately succeeds,
even though the mechanism might not be what he intended.
That Opus was shot on the way to certain death nine stories below
probably would not have changed his mode of death from suicide to homicide.
But the fact that his suicidal intent would not have been successful
caused the medical examiner to feel that he had a homicide on his hands.
The room on the ninth floor whence the shotgun blast
emanated was occupied by and elderly man and his wife.
They were arguing and he was threatening her with the shotgun.
He was so upset that, when he pulled the trigger, he completely missed
his wife and pellets went through the window striking Opus.
When one intends to kill subject A but kills subject B in the attempt,
one is guilty of the murder of subject B. When confronted with this charge,
the old man and his wife were both adamant that neither knew that the shotgun was loaded.
The old man said it was his long standing habit to threaten his wife
with the unloaded shotgun. He had no intention to murder her - therefore,
the killing of Opus appeared to be an accident.
That is, the gun had been accidentally loaded. The continuing investigation
turned up a witness who saw the old couple's son loading the shotgun approximately
six weeks prior to the fatal incident. It transpired that the old lady had cut
off her son's financial support and the son, knowing the propensity
of his father to use the shotgun threateningly, loaded the gun with the expectation
that his father would shoot his mother. The case now becomes one of murder
on the part of the son for the death of Ronald Opus. There was an exquisite twist.
Further investigation revealed that the son, one Ronald Opus,
had become increasingly despondent over the failure of his attempt to
engineer his mother's murder. This led him to jump off the ten story
building on March 23, only to be killed by a shotgun blast through a ninth story window.
The medical examiner closed the case as a suicide.